Social Media's Impact on Mental Health & Self-Diagnosis
Social media and online psychology is an emerging area in our society today, and although the long-term effects of the internet are yet to be seen, there has been some research regarding self-diagnosis surveys and online self-report questionnaires. At a glance, it seems that social media and mental health interactions are something of a double-edged sword. One research article states that,
Normalizing mental health disorders, such as anxiety, can have positive implications, such as making people feel more comfortable seeking help. However, the models examined here provide evidence that when people see a social media post that normalizes anxiety, they are more likely to identify with the person in the post, and thus are more likely to consider themselves as having an anxiety disorder. (Hasan et al., 2023)
This parasocial effect, often seen with influencers who lean heavily into making their mental health struggles a core part of their online identity, can sometimes cause others viewing their content to associate more strongly with the disorder than is actually warranted (for example, someone who follows a celebrity who frequently talks about having adult ADHD might overestimate their own ADHD symptoms and identify with a disorder that they might not, in fact, have). So, while social media can help bring awareness to certain disorders, specifically anxiety, it can also have negative implications. In reality, it is perfectly normal for everyone to be anxious from time to time, and social media is not the best place to differentiate between normal, everyday anxiety and a diagnosable anxiety disorder.
Additionally, Hasan et al. (2023) state in their article that “internet-assisted self-diagnosis can lead to misinformation, delayed treatment, low-efficacy, or dangerous self-treatment through recreational drugs”. Obviously, this can be dangerous, and shows that social media and the internet are not always the best place to go in order to be informed about mental health issues. It’s important not to make any treatment decisions or adopt a self-diagnosis based on social media. No matter how accurate a self-reporting tool on social media may claim to be, or how close an influencer’s symptoms seem to your own, always take the results with a grain of salt.
Another study looked into online self-report tools for anxiety and depression differentiated by way of symptom-based diagnosis compared to self-reported diagnostic measures (Davies et al., 2021). This was a large study containing roughly 60,000 remote participants. The findings were intriguing in that, “Particularly high agreement was found for participants with a diagnosis,” which suggests that for the participants that already had a preexisting diagnosis, the self-report and symptom based questionnaires were fairly accurate. But, of course the data was not absolutely conclusive and the article is quick to remind us that, “Further research is therefore required to validate these measures against “gold standard” clinical interviews.” Hence, as previously stated, do not take the results from a self-report questionnaire as absolute fact—but also keep in mind that there are correlations and agreements for a high percentage of participants throughout this study, and for several disorders such as GAD, depression, and other phobias.
In summary, online tools and social media can be a great place to start when you think you may be suffering from a mental disorder and want to do a quick test or are looking for more information. After all, the internet is helpful for spreading awareness about mental health disorders and diminishing the stigma attached to them. But, this does not mean that these online tests can replace the opinion of a doctor. Always rely on the “gold standard” method of an in-person clinical interview with a professional for a more accurate, reliable diagnosis and treatment plan.
Comments
Post a Comment